…from beneath the crooked bough, witness 230 years of brutal tyranny by the al Khalifas come to an end
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Obama admits Chemical Weapons Charade in Syria

Sadly and cynically, the US admission of uncertainty of Chemical Weapons use in Syria and by whom, leaves one to wonder if Obama is just building the pretense of integrity that was lost in the Fiasco of lies and deceit in Iraq. Stay tuned, the next words about Chemical Weapons will be “false flag” operation used to bring the West directly into the fray. In the mean time Chemical Weapons “protective gear” will flood into Syria. Perhaps providing cover for the 20,000, M16s stolen earlier this monthfrom the Warehouse in Kuwait? Phlipn Out

Chemical Weapons Charade in Syria
By Sharmine Narwani -29 April, 2013 – Middle East Shuffle

Let us be clear. The United States can verify absolutely nothing about the use of chemical weapons (CWs) in Syria. Any suggestion to the contrary is entirely false.

Don’t take it from me – here is what US officials have to say about the subject:

A mere 24 hours after Washington heavyweights from the White House, Pentagon and State Department brushed aside Israeli allegations of chemical weapons use in Syria, US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and the White House changed their minds. They now believe “with varying degrees of confidence” that CWs have been used “on a small scale” inside Syria.

For the uninitiated, “varying degrees of confidence” can mean anything from “no confidence whatsoever” to “the Israelis told us” – which, translated, also means “no confidence whatsoever.”

Too cavalier? I don’t think so. The White House introduced another important caveat in its detailed briefing on Thursday:

“This assessment is based in part on physiological samples. Our standard of evidence must build on these intelligence assessments as we seek to establish credible and corroborated facts. For example, the chain of custody is not clear, so we cannot confirm how the exposure occurred and under what conditions.”

“The chain of custody is not clear.” That is the single most important phrase in this whole exercise. It is the only phrase that journalists need consider – everything else is conjecture of WMDs-in-Iraq proportions.

I asked a State Department spokesman the following: “Does it mean you don’t know who has had access to the sample before it reached you? Or that the sample has not been contaminated along the way?”

He responded: “It could mean both.”

Chuck Hagel expands on that jaw-dropping admission: “We cannot confirm the origin of these weapons.” Although he goes on to conclude anyway: “but we do believe that any use of chemical weapons in Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad regime.” …more

Add facebook comments

There are no comments yet...

Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment