Posts from — October 2011

Egypt: the unfinished revolution
By Roula Khalaf – October 28, 2011 – Financial Times

In February, the fall of Hosni Mubarak unleashed euphoria in Cairo: now, frustration is rife and unrest troubles the streets as the country faces an uncertain future. Ahead of next month’s elections, the nation’s people talk about revolution – and finding the way forward.

A few hours after Hosni Mubarak’s vice-president appeared on state television to announce Egypt’s leader of 30 years was stepping down, I took a walk down the banks of the Nile. On that mild February night, a wild party of liberation had broken out in Cairo’s Tahrir Square. The scenes along the way were breathtaking. They belonged to an Arab world I had never known. Dragging their children out of bed, Egyptian families swarmed the streets, from the Kasr al-Nile bridge to the state television building, hugging each other in congratulations, lifting the children up on the army tanks and posing for pictures with soldiers. The army officers, who had placed the future of Egypt above their loyalty for Mubarak, were giddy with the hero status bestowed on them and the chants of “the army and the people in one hand”.

Down in Tahrir Square, where young Egyptians had camped out for nearly three weeks, new banners were already drafted to mark Mubarak’s departure, some held by old men who stood still amid the moving crowds. The voice of Umm Kalthum, the Arab world’s most famous singer, rang out, “ana al shaab, ana al shaab” (I am the people), and to this old revolutionary tune, the people hummed their own new slogan: “Lift your head high, you are Egyptian.”

Seized by a swell of patriotism and a longing for dignity, a population dismissed for decades as too hopeless and subdued to change its destiny was shocked by its own sudden empowerment. Tunisians had brought down their own dictator a few weeks before, sparking the Arab spring winds that blew through Cairo. But in Tahrir Square the real Arab revolution had triumphed. Egypt is not just another Arab country: it is the heart of the Arab world, its biggest nation, with more than 80m people. It determined whether Arab armies fought wars or made peace, and it gave the region its most illustrious leaders and most celebrated artists and authors. On the morning after, on February 12, the celebrations were still ongoing in Tahrir but they had taken on another startling face. As young people discovered Egypt was theirs, rather than Mubarak’s, they carried their brooms and descended on the square to pick up the rubbish and scrub the nearby monuments on the bridge. …more

POMED Notes: “The Arab Spring and Bahrain”
30 October, 2011 – POMED Wire

On Thursday, the Universal Muslim Association of America (UMAA) hosted a panel discussion entitled “The Arab Spring and Bahrain,” part of UMAA’s National Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill. Speakers included Husain Abdulla, Director of Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain; lawyer and activist Dr. Abdulhameed Dashti; exiled Bahraini dissident Al-Sayid Qasem Al-Hashemi; and Human Rights Watch’s Washington Director Tom Malinowski. Mowahid Shah moderated the event.

For full event notes, continue reading. Or, click here for the PDF. Abdulla began by noting that while the Bahraini uprising began with simple demands, the government crackdown intensified these desired reforms to calls for regime change. The U.S. administration’s initial reaction urged the Government of Bahrain to not attack peaceful protesters, and the al-Khalifa regime responded by “backing off,” allowing protesters to camp in Pearl Roundabout and announcing a National Dialogue. Then, Abdulla argued, the White House policy changed from one of support for protesters to regime stabilization. The onus for the shift, he added, was the presence of the U.S. naval base in Bahrain. Now, Abdulla said, the U.S. administration has pursued a policy of “strongly taking the side of the Bahraini government.” Furthermore, the coverage of the Bahraini revolution differed from that of its regional neighbors because of the close relationship between the U.S. and Bahrain.

Abdulla asserted that the movement in Congress against the proposed arms sale to Bahrain was sparked by the activism of human rights groups. Support for the joint House and Senate resolutions has been bi-partisan, he added. He also cited the arrival of 29 Bahrainis seeking political asylum in the U.S. over the last two months as testimony that “there is a serious problem” in Bahrain, and that the U.S. administration must “talk to our ally.” He suggested allowing peaceful protests as a “good gesture” from the al-Khalifa government, and concluded by saying that Bahraini oppositionists are facing “mercenaries in Bahrain” as well as “mercenaries in Washington,” referencing the Bahraini government’s contracts with nine lobbying firms. “The movement in Bahrain is indigenous, and its demands are fair,” he said.

Dashti then discussed the “double standard” the Bahraini uprising faces. Opposition members expected the same level of U.S. support that Egypt and Tunisia enjoyed, but have recieved an unbalanced approach that obscures the “legitimate demands of the Bahraini revolution.” He argued that the government of Bahrain has violated international human rights standards, including the conventions against genocide. The regime’s targeting of the Shia community constitutes genocide, he asserted. International organizations have failed to act. This inaction is caused by U.S. interests in the Gulf as well as the power of Saudi Arabia. He also said that the Bahraini government is “importing a new population to change the demography” of the country. The U.S., he said, controls the Gulf and Bahrain; thus, he asked Americans to “put pressure on Congress to help the Bahraini people.” …more

The US responds to “the Arab spring”: here is a “security architecture”
30 October, 2011 Angry Arab News

“With an eye on the threat of a belligerent Iran, the administration is also seeking to expand military ties with the six nations in the Gulf Cooperation Council — Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. While the United States has close bilateral military relationships with each, the administration and the military are trying to foster a new “security architecture” for the Persian Gulf that would integrate air and naval patrols and missile defense.

“Back to the future” is how Maj. Gen. Karl R. Horst, Central Command’s chief of staff, described planning for a new posture in the Gulf. He said the command was focusing on smaller but highly capable deployments and training partnerships with regional militaries. “We are kind of thinking of going back to the way it was before we had a big ‘boots on the ground’ presence,” General Horst said. “I think it is healthy. I think it is efficient. I think it is practical.” (thanks Amer) …source

Clinton Finally Expresses ‘Support’ for Saudi Women Drivers
By Patrick Goodenough – June 22, 2011 – CNS News

(CNSNews.com) – Although Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has championed women’s rights from Azerbaijan to Zambia, it took her weeks to respond to an appeal to publicly support a campaign by Saudi women to be permitted to drive.

Even then, her comments on Tuesday came not of her own initiative, but in response to a question at a press availability – and after Saudi women activists and journalists had questioned her public silence on the subject.

In her answer, Clinton signaled once again the Obama administration’s sensitivity about the U.S. being seen to be preaching change to a non-Western culture – and to an important U.S. ally. She repeatedly stressed that the driving campaign was coming from Saudi women themselves. …more

Arab Spring Reshapes Market for TV News
By ERIC PFANNER – October 30, 2011 – NYT

PARIS — As revolutions upend the political landscape across the Arab world, the news media landscape is shifting, too.

The market for Arabic-language television news, dominated for years by two satellite channels with close links to Arab rulers, is poised for a shot of new competition with the pending introduction of two 24-hour news channels backed by Western media conglomerates.

Prince Walid bin Talal, the Saudi billionaire who controls the media company Rotana, provided details last month of one of the channels, which will be named Alarab and will operate in partnership with Bloomberg, the business news and information company.

Meanwhile, British Sky Broadcasting, the pay-television provider, is moving ahead with plans for the introduction of another new channel, called Sky Arabia, in partnership with Abu Dhabi Media Investment, which is controlled by Sheik Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, a member of the ruling family of the Gulf emirate.

Analysts say the new channels, which are set to start broadcasting next year, could provide the first serious challenge in years to Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya, which have enjoyed a viewership duopoly for much of the past decade.

Joe Khalil, co-author of the book “Arab Television Industries,” said he did not think the newcomers would replace Al Jazeera, which is owned by the royal family of Qatar, or Al Arabiya, which is based in Dubai and owned by Saudi investors with royal connections. Those broadcasters have long faced competition from several other regional news channels, including BBC Arabic Television and Al Hurra, which is financed by the U.S. government.

But the new channels “are high-profile projects, and the increased diversity will put pressure on the market leaders to distinguish themselves,” Mr. Khalil said.

While the new channels missed out on the revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, as well as uprisings in other Arab countries, executives say they are confident that demand for news will continue to grow. …more

Bahraini king: Egypt’s revolutions an inspiration to all Arabs
31/10/2011 – ALMASRY ALYOUM

Egyptian revolutions throughout history have been a source of inspiration to Arabs everywhere, and all have benefited from their positive examples, said Bahraini King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa on Monday.

After meeting with Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, head of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), the king said that Egypt’s stability affects the entire region.

“We appreciate Egypt’s honorable positions, leadership and people, vis-a-vis Bahrain,” the king said.

Inspired by the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, Shia movements in Bahrain took to the streets in February to demand greater representation and access to jobs and benefits.

At least 30 were killed, hundreds wounded and more than 1000 arrested as a result, in a crackdown that enlisted the help of troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Although Shias are a majority in Bahrain, the Sunni Khalifa family rules the country. Saudi Arabia and the United States, two of Bahrain’s influential allies, view the Khalifa regime as a bulwark against the regional influence of Shia Iran.

Bahrain wishes to strengthen bilateral relations with Egypt, the king said, adding that he discussed with Tantawi means of economic, commercial, cultural, informational and military cooperation.
…source

“When they fall,” Muhammad said of the Khalifa family, which has ruled for two centuries, “there will be blood. I don’t want it to happen. Our blood is not cheap. But I don’t see it happening any other way. They just know brutality. That’s their language.”

In Rubble-Strewn Sitra, Faces of the Young Foretell a Grim Future for Bahrain
By ANTHONY SHADID – October 28, 2011 – NYT

SITRA, Bahrain — Sometimes a name suggests a condition. There was Beirut a generation ago, Baghdad more recently. In Bahrain, a Persian Gulf state so polarized that truth itself is a matter of interpretation, it is Sitra. Here, the faces of young men foretell a future for the country that looks like the rubble-strewn and violent streets of this town.

On a recent night, after clashes that erupt almost daily, one of them entered the house of a relative, squinting as though he had stumbled from a dungeon into the sun. Tear gas. His friend smirked as he showed the smooth scars left by rubber bullets fired at his leg and chest. Another shrugged as he removed his shirt to reveal a back scarred by pellets.

“Sitra,” said the friend, Sanad, “is the crisis.”

When the protests erupted in Bahrain in February, activists cast them as part of the Arab revolts, the wave of tumult that has upended an old order from Tunisia to Syria this year. That was before Saudi Arabia intervened militarily, before a crackdown ensued on the Shiite Muslim majority that was so sweeping they compared it to apartheid, before the most hard-line elements in the Sunni Muslim ruling family became ascendant.

Government officials today suggest that the crisis has ended, even as they acknowledge the damage it wrought in relations between Sunnis and Shiites in a country that had managed relative openness and even cosmopolitanism despite its entrenched inequality. “An open wound,” said Sheik Abdel-Aziz bin Mubarak al-Khalifa, a senior government counselor. But, he added, “We are in a much better place than we were three months ago.”

No one in Sitra seems to agree. This Shiite town of 80,000, a once-bucolic village of fishing and farming turned into a tableau of urban distress, is so restive that even opposition leaders shake their heads at its defiance. Nearly a third of the protesters killed — 10 so far — have come from Sitra, a half-hour drive from the capital, Manama, seething in a caldron of politicization, hardship and repression.

Though the clashes are nothing new — the 1990s witnessed similar bouts — their persistence and breadth signal the intractability of Bahrain’s conflict and mirror the unrest between the police and youths in other neglected Shiite towns.

“Sitra is a miniature version of Bahrain,” said Muhammad, another youth here, who like others interviewed did not want to be identified by his full name.
[Read more →]

Bahraini Opposition Vows More Pro-Democracy Protests until Demands are Met
30 – Ocetober, 2011 – moqawama.org

Deputy Head of Bahrain’s main opposition party al-Wefaq, Khalil al-Marzooq stated that “this struggle will continue through peaceful means and will combat government violence with even more peace”.

In an interview with German Press, al-Marzooq indicated, “We are keen to continue a popular protest outside the Bahraini parliament by carving a stronger street presence, in order to achieve genuine democracy in Bahrain”.

Al-Wefaq party was part of the parliament for five years before leaving 18 vacant seats after protesting the regime’s violent crackdown on pro-democracy peaceful protesters.

“We were there for five years, and couldn’t change a single article of the constitution or the political system”, al-Marzooq affirmed.

On this level, he reiterated that the parliament therefore has lost legitimacy in the eyes of the Bahraini people.

Stressing on the people’s demands to have democratic elections, the Bahraini opposition figure noted, “We are asking for an acceptable level of democracy in line with universal rights and principles. So we will continue to demand that the parliament be dissolves and a constitutional monarchy be installed”.

Deputy Head of al-Wefaq party further went on to sayd, “There can be no stability in Bahrain without genuine reforms. The Bahrainis need inetantional support as that shown to other Arab Spring countries”. …source

Bahraini protesters insist on demands
PressTV – Oct 30, 2011

Bahraini protesters have once again taken to the streets across the country to demand the downfall of the US-backed regime and to call for reforms and democracy.

The protests were held in Ma’ameer, Sitra, Ekr and Sinabis on Saturday night, witnesses said.

Protesters were attacked by forces reportedly deployed by the US-backed Saudi government to support the despotic Bahraini regime.

In March, troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates arrived in the island nation to assist Manama rulers in their brutal crackdown on protesters.

Bahrainis have been holding peaceful rallies since mid-February, demanding an end to the Al Khalifa family’s rule.

Scores of people have been killed and hundreds more arrested in a Manama-ordered and Saudi-backed crackdown in the country. …source

Bahrain: Academic and Medical Professionals Suffer Abuse
31 October, 2011 – POMED

The Bahraini government has ordered Mrs. Jaleela Al Salman,Vice President of Bahrain’s Teachers Association, back to prison after her release to await her appeal. Jaleela outlined what she calls “beatings and sexual intimidation under threats of rape that lead her to making a forced confession of guilt before she received her first official day in court.” The International Federation of Health and Human Rights Organizations sent a letter to Dr. Fatima Mohammed Al-Balushi, Bahrain Minister of Human Rights and Social Development, calling for an independent investigation into allegations of abuse of jailed medical professionals as well as calling for their release from prison.

As the violent crackdown on peaceful anti-government protesters continues, reports have emerged of protesters sustaining serious eye injuries due to excessive force by security forces. The Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) reported “often riot police aim directly at protesters specifically at the chest and head area. The wounds on protesters speak for themselves, especially the countless eye injuries which have lead to many protesters losing their eyes.” …source

Plea to free prisoners
Saudi Arabia – October 31, 2011

RIYADH. Scores of Saudi Arabians have signed a petition, to be sent to newly appointed crown prince Nayef bin Abdel Aziz, to release political prisoners and lift travel bans on intellectuals.

The petition, so far signed by more than 140 people, called for the release of ”prisoners of conscience or those who were jailed without a legal justification, and lifting the unlawful travel ban”. It was posted by the Monitor of Human Rights on social networking websites.

Prince Nayef was appointed as crown prince on Thursday, six days after the death of his predecessor and brother Sultan bin Abdel Aziz in New York.
Advertisement: Story continues below

Prince Nayef, 78, has been the kingdom’s interior minister since 1975 and became a second deputy prime minister in 2007.

…source

US awakening needed after Arab spring: Mowahid
APP – 30 October, 2011

WASHINGTON, Oct 30 (APP): The West must reassess the status quo in the Middle East with respect to popular aspirations of the people, as existing uprisings show that the elite in the region are losing control, Mowahid Hussain Shah, attorney-at-law and noted expert on the region, said at a forum held on Capitol Hill, the seat of the US Congress. “Justice and truth are with the protesters and the untenable status quo – with power concentrated in the hands of the ruling elites – is not sustainable,” he maintained, at a colloquium on the Arab Spring and Bahrain.

The United States, he argued, needs an awakening to ground realities in the Middle East and has to,accordingly, reflect broader consistency in its policies, including also the plight of the Palestinian people.

Mowahid Shah particularly underlined that Washington can no longer afford bypassing issues of dignity and equality, which are driving the existing unrest in the region and elsewhere.
The packed event, which attracted congressional staffers, think-tank experts, academia, and community activists, was co-hosted by Dr. Pervez Shah, a known urologist and Secretary General of the Universal Muslim Association of America.

In this connection, Mowahid urged US leaders to adhere to their own policy statements by focusing on the next generation, instead of the next election, and by recognising that what was acceptable yesterday is no longer acceptable today. …source

Three Saudi YouTube social activists released
(AFP) – 29 October, 2011

RIYADH — Three Saudis detained earlier this month after posting an online video showing poverty in the oil-rich kingdom were released on Sunday, activists said.

Firas Baqna, Khalid al-Rasheed and Hussam al-Darwish were arrested in Al-Sahaba district, north of Riyadh, on October 19 after their documentary was aired by the London-based opposition television Al-Islah.

“We can confirm their release … two weeks after their arrest,” the activists told AFP on condition of anonymity.

The series on poverty in Saudi Arabia, first posted on YouTube, is entitled “Malub Aleina,” meaning “We are being cheated” in Arabic.

Al-Islah channel is a mouthpiece for the banned Movement for Islamic Reform in Saudi Arabia, led by Saad al-Faqih.

At the time of their arrest, a rights activist told AFP that the authorities suspected the three young men “were receiving finance from the channel and were taken into custody for interrogation.”

One segment of the YouTube series aired on Al-Islah was filmed in Riyadh’s impoverished neighbourhoods. It featured an interview with a mosque imam claiming poverty was responsible for vice and drug abuse in his neighbourhood.

Saudi Arabia, where protests are banned, has a burgeoning youth population, with more than 50 percent aged 24 or under, according to the latest Arab Human Development report, and faces a challenge in providing jobs for graduates. …source

Yet despite increasing talk and concern over the unnatural relationship between the West and Islamist movements in the Arab region, there is growing insistence among the region’s enlightened and modern youths that they will not allow this relationship to direct their lives and dictate their course. It would thus be more logical for the West to listen carefully to what is happening at the youths’ scene, as well as on the traditional secularist and modernist scenes, and to realize the danger of what it is doing for these elements and the road to change brought about by the Arab Spring.

The West is Hijacking Arab Revolutions to the Benefit of Islamists
Fri, 28 October 2011 – Raghida Dergham, Dubai

While the West speaks of the necessity of accepting the results of the democratic process, in terms of Islamists coming to power in the Arab region, there are increased suspicions regarding the goals pursued by the West in its new policy of rapprochement with the Islamist movement, in what is a striking effort at undermining modern, secular and liberal movements. The three North African countries in which revolutions of change have taken place, are witnessing a transitional process that is noteworthy, not just in domestic and local terms, but also in terms of the roles played by foreign forces, both regional and international.

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is trying to hijack the youth’s revolution with the help of the West. This is while bearing in mind that Egypt is considered to be the “command center” for the Muslim Brotherhood’s network in different Arab countries. The followers of the An-Nahda in Tunisia are wrapping their message with moderation as they prepare to hijack the democracy that Tunisia’s youth dream of, while being met by applause and encouragement from the West in the name of the “fairness” of the electoral process. Libya, where the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO) is in a “marriage of convenience” with Islamist rebels, has become a hub of extremism and lawlessness, with a plethora of military aid being collected by an assortment of armed Islamists who aim to exclude others from power. In Yemen, where a struggle for power rages on, a war is taking place between extremism and a harsher and more violent brand of extremism, with so-called “moderate Islam” in the middle as a means of salvation, even as the latter’s ideology remains neither modern nor liberal, and is rather lacking when it comes to the fundamentals of democracy and equality. In Syria, where the battle for freedom is at its most difficult phase, the youths of the revolution fear what could very much be under discussion behind the scenes between the West and the Islamist movements, in terms of collaboration and of strengthening the Islamists’ hold on power, in a clear bid to hijack the revolution of a youth that aspires to freedom in its every sense, not to yet another brand of tyranny and authoritarianism.

Yet despite increasing talk and concern over the unnatural relationship between the West and Islamist movements in the Arab region, there is growing insistence among the region’s enlightened and modern youths that they will not allow this relationship to direct their lives and dictate their course. It would thus be more logical for the West to listen carefully to what is happening at the youths’ scene, as well as on the traditional secularist and modernist scenes, and to realize the danger of what it is doing for these elements and the road to change brought about by the Arab Spring.

The obsession of some Westerners with the so-called “Turkish model” of “moderate Islam”, able to rule with discipline and democracy, seems naïve, essentially because of its assumption that such a model can automatically be applied on the Arab scene, without carefully considering the different background and conditions that exist in Turkey and the Arab countries. There is also some naivety in assuming than the “Iranian model” of religious autocratic rule that oppresses people, forbids pluralism and turns power into tyranny, can be excluded as a possibility.
[Read more →]

Occupy First. Demands Come Later

Critics say the Occupy cause is nebulous. Protesters will need to address what comes next – but beware a debate on enemy turf
by Slavoj Žižek – October 29, 2011 – Guardian/UK

What to do after the occupations of Wall Street and beyond – the protests that started far away, reached the centre and are now, reinforced, rolling back around the world? One of the great dangers the protesters face is that they will fall in love with themselves. In a San Francisco echo of the Wall Street occupation this week, a man addressed the crowd with an invitation to participate as if it was a happening in the hippy style of the 60s: “They are asking us what is our programme. We have no programme. We are here to have a good time.” [ Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images)] ‘The protesters should fall in love with hard and patient work – they are the beginning, not the end.’ (Photograph: Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images)

Carnivals come cheap – the true test of their worth is what remains the day after, how our normal daily life will be changed. The protesters should fall in love with hard and patient work – they are the beginning, not the end. Their basic message is: the taboo is broken; we do not live in the best possible world; we are allowed, obliged even, to think about alternatives.

In a kind of Hegelian triad, the western left has come full circle: after abandoning the so-called “class struggle essentialism” for the plurality of anti-racist, feminist, and other struggles, capitalism is now clearly re-emerging as the name of the problem. So the first lesson to be taken is: do not blame people and their attitudes. The problem is not corruption or greed, the problem is the system that pushes you to be corrupt. The solution is not “Main Street, not Wall Street”, but to change the system where Main Street cannot function without Wall Street.

There is a long road ahead, and soon we will have to address the truly difficult questions – not questions of what we do not want, but about what we do want. What social organisation can replace the existing capitalism? What type of new leaders do we need? What organs, including those of control and repression? The 20th-century alternatives obviously did not work.

While it is thrilling to enjoy the pleasures of the “horizontal organisation” of protesting crowds with egalitarian solidarity and open-ended free debates, we should also bear in mind what GK Chesterton wrote: “Merely having an open mind is nothing; the object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.” This holds also for politics in times of uncertainty: the open-ended debates will have to coalesce not only in some new master-signifiers, but also in concrete answers to the old Leninist question, “What is to be done?” …more

Youth Coalition for Revolutions of Dignity

Who we are

An independent youth coalition that is not politically or religiously affiliated, of human rights activists, striving through peaceful means to establish civil governments that institutionalize human rights and youth involvement. This unity is essential to speed up and guarantee the success of the revolutions that have been led by the youth. The countries involved in this coalition so far consist of: Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, Tunisia and Egypt.
Why we are

The revolutions for dignity ignited with the fire Mohammed AlBouazizi set to himself on December 17th, 2010, because of the indignity and humiliation practiced by the authoritarian regimes against the people. This fire quickly spread through the region after the fall of the dictator Bin Ali in Tunisia. The common violations practiced by all the regimes mentioned above are:

– Marginalization of the youth
– Arbitrary arrests
– Torture
– Unfair trials
– Corruption
– Lack of basic freedoms such as: freedom of speech and press, freedom of association, and freedom of assembly.
– Discrimination as common practice to create divides and instigate hate between the populations.

These authoritarian regimes also reacted to these uprisings in mostly the same ways:
– Extra-judicial killings
– Mass arrests
– Physical, psychological and sexual torture
– Use of excessive force
– Kidnappings
– Blaming “foreign” entities of inciting these revolutions and labeling them as conspiracies against the state

Mission

– To initiate joint actions in all these countries which will aim to do the same as the popular protests, except they will be united across the region.

-To create a platform dedicated to sharing ideas, methods, actions and means of a peaceful revolution

-To create a campaign directed at providing the media with information about the realities of what is happening on the ground, with evidence and documentation to dispel myths and misinformation.

-To pressure the media and the governments worldwide to stop the use of double standards and to support all movements for rights and freedom in all countries.

We recognize that none of these revolutions are sectarian; rather, the governments wish to create sectarianism to divide and conquer. We as a coalition will work against this agenda. We affirm that should any country reach the goal of a civil government which institutionalizes human rights and civil liberties does not mean their responsibility ends towards the other revolutions. This coalition will aim at making sure that all youth groups tay involved until all countries reach the same aspirations. The addition of other countries is encouraged and supported.

This first statement is our first action towards bringing together all youth groups leading these revolutions, as the success of this coalition depends on the involvement of the youth groups and protesters in it. We ask of all youth groups involved in the revolutions of dignity to put out a statement endorsing this initiative, so that we can begin planning the joint actions.
In conclusion

These revolutions started peaceful, will remain peaceful, and will succeed because their strength lies within its peacefulness (with the exception of Libya). We stress upon that these revolutions are not to be directed at the tools and arms of the regimes, but rather at creating a new inclusive government that represents all factions of society. Thus we enshrine this ideology of peaceful resistance, which is our strongest weapon against these authoritarian regimes.

Peacefully yours, Youth Coalition for Revolutions of Dignity Monday October 24th, 2011 See their new Website HERE

Slavoj Zizek: ‘Now the field is open’
The philosopher discusses the momentous changes taking place in the global financial and political system.
Talk to Al Jazeera – 29 Oct 2011

From the Middle East to the streets of London and cities across the US there is a discontent with the status quo. Whether it is with the iron grip of entrenched governments or the widening economic divide between the rich and those struggling to get by. But where are those so hungry for change heading? How profound is their long-term vision to transform society?

Slovenian-born philosopher Slavoj Zizek, whose critical examination of both capitalism and socialism has made him an internationally recognised intellectual, speaks to Al Jazeera’s Tom Ackerman about the momentous changes taking place in the global financial and political system.

In his distinct and colourful manner, he analyses the Arab Spring, the eurozone crisis, the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and the rise of China. Concerned about the future of the existing western democratic capitalism Zizek believes that the current “system has lost its self-evidence, its automatic legitimacy, and now the field is open.”

“I think today the world is asking for a real alternative. Would you like to live in a world where the only alternative is either anglo-saxon neoliberalism or Chinese-Singaporean capitalism with Asian values?

I claim if we do nothing we will gradually approach a kind of a new type of authoritarian society. Here I see the world historical importance of what is happening today in China. Until now there was one good argument for capitalism: sooner or later it brought a demand for democracy…

What I’m afraid of is with this capitalism with Asian values, we get a capitalism much more efficient and dynamic than our western capitalism. But I don’t share the hope of my liberal friends – give them ten years, [and there will be] another Tiananmen Square demonstration – no, the marriage between capitalism and democracy is over.” Slavoj Zizek. …source

Bahrain foreign minister on D.C. charm offensive
By Josh Rogin – October 26, 2011 – 6:38 PM Share

Bahrain’s government is under pressure — not just from protesters in Manama, but also from parts of the Washington foreign policy community, who want to delay U.S. arms sales to the country. Bahraini Foreign Minister Shaikh Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa has been in town for over a week meeting with officials and lawmakers to assuage U.S. concerns over the kingdom’s domestic crackdown, and sat down for a lengthy interview with The Cable.

Khalifa’s message was clear: The Bahraini government is sensitive to international concerns about its treatment of protesters, pledges to follow the recommendations of an upcoming commission report on its actions, and wants to reinforce that the international community should not lose sight of the broader security situation in the region, characterized by the Iranian threat.

“I’m here to see our friends in the administration and Congress to try to explain what’s happening in Bahrain,” he said. “We are just before the issuance of the commission of inquiry’s report. I’m here to show our commitment to that, how we will accept it and do all that is necessary to implement it.”

That report, being written by Bahraini Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI), was established by King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa and is chaired by human rights advocate and professor M. Cherif Bassiouni. It is expected to be released on Nov. 23. Bassiouni has faced some criticism for making statements that appear to be to conciliatory to the regime, but he recently promised his report will give the Bahraini government “some bitter pills to swallow.”

After five U.S. senators wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton earlier this month to protest the pending $53 million sale of armored Humvees and missiles to Bahrain, the State Department wrote a letter to Congress last week linking the arms sale directly to the BICI report.

Khalifa said his government has been alarmed by congressional opposition to the arms sale, but said that he trusts the Obama administration to judge the outcome of the commission’s report fairly. He also argued that a delay in completing the arms sale would not be in the interest of regional security.

“What worries us is that we don’t need to delay any requirement for the necessary architecture to protect the region. Bahrain is a cornerstone of that,” he said. “That’s what I’m talking about here and I’m finding very listening ears.”

Of course, one component of that emerging regional security architecture is the Peninsula Shield Force, made up of dozens of tanks and approximately 40,000 troops that came to Bahrain via Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE during the height of the unrest in March. Those forces are still there but are “purely to deter external threats,” Khalifa maintains.

Opposition groups claim that 30 protesters have been killed by the government during its domestic crackdown, and more than 1,000 have been arrested. Independent organizations such as Human Rights Watch have reported that the government has employed brutal tactics, including using masked thugs to sweep up lawyers and other activists in nighttime raids.

The Obama administration has several interests in Bahrain, the fact that the U.S. Fifth Fleet is stationed there being chief among them. Bahrain is also a client state of Saudi Arabia and policymakers have voiced fears that a victory by the protest movement would strengthen Iranian influence in the country.

Khalifa didn’t meet with any of the senators who signed the letter, but he did meet with Sens. John McCain (R-AZ), John Kerry (D-MA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Mark Kirk (R-IL), Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH). …more

17 malicious cases and jail terms for 96-years for prisoner of conscience, Sheikh Mohammed Habib Almiqdad

27 Oct 2011 – BCHR

Increasing issues and evidence are brought to the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, which indicates that the Bahraini authorities have exploited the events of February 14, 2011 and its repercussions for revenge against its opponents of political and human rights activists . The case of Sheikh Mohammed Habib Almiqdad is an outstanding example of this.

The cleric and independent opposition activist Sheikh Mohammed Habib al-Miqdad, 48 years, has been in arbitrary detention since April 1, 2011. There were detailed reports that he has been exposed to psychological and physical torture for few months while being isolated in incommunicado detention before being brought to the military prosecutor and the courts of the National Safety (military). He was tortured on the hands of the king’s son Nasser ben Hamad. He was charged in 17 cases ranging between the charges of “inciting and seeking to overthrow the regime” and “incitement to the formation of gangs to attack foreigners or to kidnap security officers.” According to defense lawyers, the prosecution had failed to provide real evidence on those charges. The national security men said they have their “confidential sources”, and some of the detainees accused in the same cases confessed under torture as torture marks are still visible on their bodies. Reports by Medical examiner of the military justice proved that Sheikh Mohammed Habib Al-Miqdad was himself exposed to physical torture . This is also expected to be in the reports of foreign doctors who are assigned by “Independent Commission of Inquiry ” and who had examined the health of Sheikh Al-Miqdad.

The military prosecutor has failed to provide any evidence that Sheikh Miqdad was inciting violence, nevertheless all the speeches that were presented in the papers include explicitly his call to work peacefully and avoid violence. Sheikh Miqdad so far has been brought to the military court “national safety” that lacks in international standards for fair trial and legitimacy. This court conflict with international standards laws such as the Terrorism Act and the articles on the security of the state of the Penal Code of 1976, which criminalizes the exercise of basic rights such as freedom of expression, assembly and association.

The total breach of fair trial standards to the extent that Sheikh Mikdad, as defendant did not have in most cases, an adequate opportunity to consult legal, but has not been brought to some of the sessions of the trials and was aware of them through press papers which were brought to him in prison. As he had not given, in any of the hearings, the opportunity to speak before the court as well as they didn’t allow any of the other defendants. The lawyers were not given enough room both in the preparation or provision of oral arguments or to provide defense witnesses. …more

Obama’s ‘Peace’ Legacy — Drones, Death Squads, And Destruction Everywhere
8/29/11 – By Thomas H. Naylor – Counterpunch

Pressenza Pressenza International Press Agency Washington DC, 8/29/11 Hardly a week goes by in which we do not learn of the deaths of innocent civilians in Afghanistan or Pakistan resulting from attacks by U.S. drones. Attack drones have also been deployed in Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.

This form of pilotless aircraft can be used to inflict death and destruction anywhere in the world. Drones are controlled by well-trained, high-tech, gutless assassins seated in air conditioned comfort in front of sophisticated instrument panels thousands of miles away from their intended targets.

The beauty of desktop, drone warfare is that it is neat, clean, precise, risk-free, sanitized, and bloodless and can be waged by those who have never set foot on a battlefield or smelled the stench of death. It’s almost like playing a video game.

The Pentagon recently ordered 55 Global Hawk drones for a cool $23 billion. There is even talk of converting the Burlington International Airport in Vermont into a drone base.

A ‘Perfect’ Killing Machine

Drones represent the perfect instruments of war for a risk averse president who shies away from hand-to-hand political combat. With drones are associated feelings of power and control. We are in charge. There is no face-to-face conflict whatsoever.

Drones also offer endless possibilities as surveillance aircraft for high-tech spying, a practice with which the Obama administration seems to feel quite comfortable.

U.S. Special Operations In 120 Countries

Under the leadership of former CIA Director Leon Panetta, the Pentagon will have U.S. Special Operations forces deployed in no less than 120 countries around the world by year-end.

These instant strike forces include Navy Seals, Army Delta Forces, Rangers, and Green Berets. Special Operations forces have been used extensively in Afghanistan and Iraq. Navy Seals garnered international attention recently with their successful assassination attack on Osama bin Laden. Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi surely would be next!

“Desist… Or Be Prepared To Die”

One can imagine a scenario in the not too distant future in which Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez receive phone calls from the White House saying, “Cease and desist, or be prepared to die.”

With high-tech, American death squads spread around the world, such a threat becomes increasingly credible. Will this soon become the preferred way to deal with any nation which has the audacity to challenge the American way? China and Russia might still be viewed as exceptions to the rule by the Pentagon.

Obama’s ‘Peace’ Speech…

By far, the most prescient line in President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech was, “There will be times when nations will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.”

Is it possible that what Obama really had in mind with his “hope and change” mantra was replacing old fashioned, conventional warfare with a more sophisticated, high-tech, stealthy, cowardly form of warfare involving drones and kinetic strike death squads?

“Meaningless! Meaningless!” said the Teacher in the book of Ecclesiastes. “Everything is meaningless!” …source

A death squad is an armed military, police, insurgent, or terrorist squad that conducts extrajudicial killings, assassinations, and forced disappearances of persons as part of a war, insurgency or terror campaign. These killings are often conducted in ways meant to ensure the secrecy of the killers’ identities, so as to avoid accountability.[1][2]

Death squads are often, but not exclusively, associated with the violent political repression under dictatorships, totalitarian states and similar regimes. They typically have the tacit or express support of the state, as a whole or in part (see state terrorism). Death squads may comprise a secret police force, paramilitary group or official government units with members drawn from the military or the police. They may also be organized as vigilante groups.

“Extrajudicial killings” are the illegal killing of leading political, trades union, dissidents, and social figures by either the state government, state authorities like the armed forces and police… …more

Several scholars have accused the United States of conducting state terrorism. They have written about the liberal democracies and their use of state terrorism, particularly in relation to the Cold War. According to them, state terrorism was used to protect the interest of capitalist elites, and the U.S. organized a neo-colonial system of client states, co-operating with local elites to rule through terror. However, little of this work has been recognized by other scholars of terrorism or even of state terrorism.[1]

Works include Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman’s The political economy of human rights (1979), Herman’s The real terror network (1985), Alexander L. George’ Western state terrorism (1991), Frederick Gareau’s State terrorism and the United States (2004) and Doug Stokes’ America’s other war (2005).

Beginning in the late 1970s, Chomsky and Herman wrote a series of books on the United States and state terrorism. Their writings coincided with reports by Amnesty International and other human rights organizations of a new global “epidemic” of state torture and murder. Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states. Worldwide, 74% of countries that used torture on an administrative basis were U.S. client states, receiving military and other support to retain power. They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy. …more