…from beneath the crooked bough, witness 230 years of brutal tyranny by the al Khalifas come to an end

Bahrain charging 3 police with murder in uprising deaths, plans payouts to victims’ families
26 June, 2012 – Washington Post

MANAMA, Bahrain — Bahrain said Tuesday that three police officers on trial over killing demonstrators during street protests last year will now face murder charges and could face the death penalty.

The defendants, who were not named, include a police lieutenant, according to a statement by the Gulf nation’s Information Affairs Authority. They were originally being tried on the lesser charge of manslaughter.

They are on trial for three separate shooting deaths that occurred in February and March 2011.

Conviction on manslaughter charges carries a maximum sentence of seven years in prison, but a murder conviction can result in life imprisonment or the death penalty, according to the IAA statement.

“If convicted of murder, employees of the Ministry of Interior are likely to receive the toughest penalties allowed by law,” it added.

A report issued in November by a commission authorized by Bahrain’s Sunni Muslim rulers cited medical reports that found all three victims were shot from close range. The report determined that their deaths were the result of excessive force by police.

The officers’ trial resumes July 10.

In a related development, authorities said they have begun the process of giving compensation to families of people killed during the uprising.

At least 50 people have been killed since the violence began in the strategic island nation, home to the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet. Many were protesters, but security forces were also among the dead.

A total of $2.6 million is being paid out to the families of 17 victims initially, according to an IAA statement. It quoted Judge Khalid Hassan Ajaji, a Justice Ministry official, who said the office handling the claims began its work in March.

The statement did not name the recipients.

However, three defense lawyers representing several victims among opposition protesters said they were unaware of any payments being made so far.

“Nothing has been paid to any victim, according to my information,” defense lawyer Mohsen al-Alawi told The Associated Press. “The government said it will pay the victims, but nothing has been paid.”

Two other lawyers, Abdullah al-Shamlawi and Jalila al-Sayed, also said they did not know of any payments being made.

Last September, Bahrain’s king ordered the creation of a fund to compensate victims of the Arab Spring-inspired unrest that broke out in February 2011.

The country has experienced near daily protests for 16 months in an uprising by the kingdom’s Shiite majority seeking greater political rights from the Western-backed Sunni monarchy. …more

Many months of so-called police reform and political reform appear to have done little to improve exercise of the right to peaceful assembly. Denying a permit request was bad enough, but the decision to attack obviously peaceful protesters with completely excessive force was much more serious.

Bahrain: Police Attack Peaceful Protest – Authorities Continue to Deny Access to International Rights Groups
27 June, 2012 – Joe Stork – Human Rights Watch

(Beirut)– Bahraini authorities should immediately end the use of security forces to unlawfully attack peaceful protesters, Human Rights Watch said today. Riot police used teargas and sound bombs to disperse a demonstration on June 22, 2012, called by Al-Wefaq, Bahrain’s largest opposition group.

A small group of 25 or 30 people, some carrying flowers and led by Al-Wefaq’s leader, Sheikh Ali Salman, attempted to march to the protest site after the Ministry of Interior denied their request for a permit. They were stopped by a more or less equal number of riot police. Four witnesses told Human Rights Watch that riot police shot “flash-bang” grenades and teargas directly at the protesters without provocation. A video examined by Human Rights Watch appears to show police at first tossing flash-bang grenades into the crowd and then firing multiple rounds of the same type of device from riot control guns at extremely close range. The protesters behaved peacefully throughout and posed no threat of any kind to the officers or anyone else.

“Many months of so-called police reform and political reform appear to have done little to improve exercise of the right to peaceful assembly,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “Denying a permit request was bad enough, but the decision to attack obviously peaceful protesters with completely excessive force was much more serious.”

Ali al-Mowali, 27, was hospitalized with apparently serious head injuries. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that a teargas canister hit al-Mowali when riot police attacked from a distance of just a few meters. He is being treated at the Salmaniya Medical Complex. At least three other people had lesser injuries including Salman, the Al-Wefaq leader, the witnesses reported.

Authorities arrested five protesters and charged them with illegal gathering, Jawad Fairooz, a leader of al-Wefaq, told Human Rights Watch. Al-Mowali is reportedly among those facing charges.

In a statement, the Interior Ministry said it will investigate the incident, but blamed the organizers for the casualties, saying, “They didn’t care about exposing the safety of the participants to danger.” The statement did not allege that the protesters were violent or threatening at any point.

“An official investigation into this incident is certainly warranted, leading to disciplinary action, and criminal prosecution of officers shown to have endangered lives with reckless use of crowd control devices,” Stork said. …more

Media Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Facilities As Talks Fail
22 June, 2012 – There Will Be War

The recently wrapped up Moscow talks between the P5+1 (the five U.N. Security Council members plus Germany) and Iran over the latter’s nuclear program, the second round after those held Baghdad in late May, have failed to bear fruit. To play the blame game and castigate just one side would be an exercise in schoolyard oversimplification.

In the end, it seems Iranian negotiators could not entertain a strict demand to “stop, shut and ship”—stop enriching, shut down the Fordow site and ship out their load of 19.75 percent uranium. Not a shock that they balked: this is basically telling a proud nation it has no right to an independent nuclear program, that it should dismantle years of hard, complicated work and toss hundreds of millions of rials into the Gulf. Meanwhile Iranian promises of a fatwa against nuclear weapons, of full cooperation with the IAEA, and of low-grade enrichment limits—should sanctions be relaxed—did little to assuage the U.S. and its cohorts. Rightly so: Why would the Western nations trust an antagonistic, power-hungry regime who will say or do anything to improve its chances at regional hegemony? Indeed, much has been written about how both sides have overplayed their hands, feeling they have the leverage to walk away from the negotiating table.

This breakdown means we must prepare for the return of an endless onslaught of articles baldly assuming an imminent military strike on Iran’s enrichment facilities, similar to those we saw on cover stories through January and February. We will see not only straight-up calls for a pre-emptive attack but articles like those in The New York Times that correctly caught flak for their subtle allusions to Iran’s nuclear arsenal, which doesn’t exist. Back then, the eager calls by warhawks in the U.S. and Israel to bomb Iran backfired, even as scare tactic, by prompting numerous Israeli military and Mossad vets to denounce the plan as nothing short of stupid.

Fast forward to June: Even before the negotiations officially ended, the calls for strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities were coming in loud as well as insidious.

Jumping the gun and surprising no one was The Weekly Standard’s Jamie Fly and Will Kristol. Though the bulk of their advice amounted to “isn’t it time for the president to ask Congress for Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iran’s nuclear program,” the buildup to this gem was meant to manipulate the uninformed. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion but using a 1936 Winston Churchill speech to make the implicit/explicit connection of Iran to Nazi Germany is tired, cliched and wrong. Points awarded for not referencing the classic warmonger Chamberlain-Munich-1938 catch-all (which was probably considered) though I predict this will be regurgitated ad nauseam soon. …more

In The Cellars of Death, Bahraini Detainees are Tortured
26 June, 2012 – EBOHR

Bahrain prisons, are not less violent than Abu Ghraib or the Guantanamo as what happened there and still happening is way beyond one’s imagination. Its scary, brutal and so violent! After documenting some of the cases and stories of mass arrests and tortures I am not sure if I could ever survive if I was to be in the detainees shoes.

My father-in-law Mohamed Hasan Mohamed Jawad (Parweez) who is 65 years old is an independent Human Rights Activist and the eldest prisoner in Bahrain. He was convicted in a so-called “terrorist cell” known by The Alliance for Republic, in the top leading cases in Bahrain consisting of 14 opposition figures and leaders.

He was tortured severely after that he was kidnapped by the Bahraini army alongside the Peninsula Shield forces in March 22, 2011. He went missing for more than 50 days where everybody knew absolutely nothing about him and his family started thinking: “he could be dead”. During that time, he was tortured underground in the ministry of interior main office in Manama to a point where his both legs were drilled with an electrical drill, electrocuted, beaten, kicked and punched on the face several times for long cold months. He wrote his first diary from inside AlGurain military prison under the title of (The diaries of a prisoner of conscience in the cellars of death) in which he stated very frankly the very details of his arrest, investigation, torture and military trails and sentence for 15 years of imprisonment. A fact worth mentioning is that he noted in his diaries witnessing Martyr Karim Fakhrawi’s death under torture while being electrocuted with him in the same room.

In addition to all that, he was tortured brutally by the son of the king, Naser Bin Hamad AlKhalifa, who is the Commander of the Royal Guard, the Chairman of the Supreme Council for Youth and Sport, and the President of the Bahrain Olympic Committee. Naser Bin Hamad AlKhalifa who is a father of a nearly 2 years old girl called Sheema worked on torturing my father-in-law Parweez (65 years old) through beating his head continuously with a hose, bashing his head to the walls, while resting in between! My father-in-law still suffers from terrible headaches and pain in head back, legs and pelvis due to that.

Another personal case of a torture was that of my uncle Shaikh Abduladheem AlMohtadi -50 years old- who is a religious scholar and an author of the most Bahraini books published. He was also tortured badly, and his hand -the one which he writes with- was intentionally broken under torture by mercenaries working for the Ministry of Interior. …more

Rights group condemns “insulting” Bahrain payouts
26 June, 2012 – Al Akhbar

A leading Bahraini rights group on Tuesday condemned the decision to pay the families killed by security forces as “insulting.”

Bahrain announced it would pay $2.6 million to 17 families over deaths last year during an uprising that the Gulf Arab state put down by force.

“Disbursement of compensation to the families of 17 deceased persons has begun in keeping with the implementation of the recommendations of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI),” said a government statement citing a justice ministry official, adding this amounted to $153,000 per individual.

It gave no details on who the recipients were.

Yet Maryam Al-Khawaja, acting head of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, said the payouts were an “insult” to the dead.

“The Bahraini government has been not only refused to acknowledge the pain and suffering of the people who lost family during the protest movement because of the excessive use of force, but it has also targeted those families – either through arrests or desecrating the graves of those killed,” she said.

“The offering of monetary compensation seems a little disingenuous and there are many that feel its more of an insult than anything else,” she added.

The BICI, an investigative body head by international legal experts, said in November at least 35 people died during the crackdown on the unrest, which began in February 2011 after revolts in Egypt and Tunisia.

The dead were mainly protesters, but also included five security personnel and seven foreigners. The report said five people died due to torture.

Bahrain, host to the US Fifth Fleet, has been under pressure to implement the BICI recommendations of police, judicial, media and education reform. …more

BCHR: Release of Testimony of former BCHR Director Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja

26th June, 2012: International Day Against Torture

Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja’s speech before the Supreme Court of Appeal 22/5/2012

Gentlemen, President and members of the honorable Supreme Court of Appeal,

Peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you,

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak before your venerable selves, as I have been deprived of this right throughout the previous stages of the litigation. Kindly note that my statement has been excluded during the investigation as a result of me being subjected to torture.

I, the Bahraini citizen Abdulhadi Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja, have been subjected since the April 9th 2011 to arbitrary arrest, incommunicado detention, psychological and physical torture, sexual assault and unfair trial, without having committed any offense for which I deserve legal punishment, in addition to torture and other violations criminalized by international and national laws. Please note that I do not belong to any association or political group, though this is not an offense in itself but rather a natural right of any human being.

These current and previous violations were in fact motivated by the thorny, difficult path which I have chosen, that is to defend human rights, not only as a matter of specialization and career – given that I am a researcher and trainer in this area – but also that I have decided that my duty is to stand with the oppressed and the victims of various abuses to which they are exposed, disregarding the risks and reactions of those who perpetrated such violations. Thus, my activities and practice involved serious issues such as political and financial corruption, arbitrary detention, torture, the privileges of the ruling class, sectarian and ethnic discrimination, as well as other topics including poverty and the right to human dignity, adequate jobs and housing, and the rights of foreign workers.

And if at the beginning back in the eighties

my activity involved volunteering with the “Committee for the Defense of Political Prisoners in Bahrain”, which is considered a wing of one of the opposition political groups, it has, however, been shifted at the beginning of the nineties into working completely independent through founding “The Bahrain Human Rights Organization,” which played a fundamental and decisive role in bringing Bahrain out of the era of security of the State, through its activities in Western capitals in collaboration with the United Nations and international human rights organizations. I am honored to have gained then my second nationality when I became a political refugee in the Kingdom of Denmark, which ensured my freedom, dignity and shelter when I was facing persecution in my country of Bahrain. However, I never hesitated in returning to Bahrain in 2001 when I was allowed to, and there I continued carrying out my duty in education and training on human rights issues in Bahrain and abroad, assisting victims of violations to embark on a peaceful movement to demand their rights, in addition to monitoring and documenting human rights violations. As a result, the price I have been paying throughout the past ten years was facing physical assaults by security forces, arrest, detention, unfair trials, smear campaigns, and travel bans. This was the case even during the period from November 2008 to February 2011, during which I worked as a regional coordinator for Frontline Defenders, a leading international organization – based in Dublin and Brussels – which focuses on the protection of human rights defenders all over the world. The fact that I have resigned from my post as president of “The Bahrain Center for Human Rights” before undertaking my work at the international organization; which was not relevant to the situation of human rights in Bahrain – did not make any difference; for an overwhelming spirit of revenge was motivating those who have been targeted by my previous activity due to their responsibility in relation to the perpetration of violations through their positions as security and political officials, as well as them suspecting that – under cover -I have been using my international work to provide aid to local activists in Bahrain.

Then came the events of February 14th, and the subsequent declaration of a state of national safety to make it the right opportunity for revenge, especially that after I witnessing all those dead and injured in the first few days I decided to resign from my international post and to dedicate myself to full-time voluntary work in Bahrain to contribute to the popular peaceful movement and ensure its effectiveness in attaining rights, in addition to monitoring and documenting violations that occurred during the events. To these ends I took part in seminars, delivered speeches and participated in various meetings that were attended by representatives of political associations and groups, including political and civil rights activists, and jurists; in my capacity as an independent human rights defender. Those meetings were held at the headquarters of political associations and residents of political figures, and they were not secret and did not intend to establish new groups or create working plans, they were merely a platform for consultation and exchange of opinions in the midst of escalating and serious events. …more

Turkey Threatens Syria
25 June, 2012 – POMED

Turkey gave a warning to Syria today with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan telling parliament that if the latter country’s troops approached the border, they would be considered a military threat. Syria downed a Turkish jet last week and fired on a recovery operation that was attempting to rescue the lost pilots, whose plane went down over the Eastern Mediterranean. Erdogan had stern words for Syria, asserting that “this incident shows that Syria has become an open threat to Turkey, so we have come to a brand new level…Any military element that approaches the Turkish border from Syria by posing a security risk and danger will be regarded as a threat and treated as a military target.” NATO also condemned the incident, but Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen indicated his expectation that the situation will not escalate any further.

Meanwhile, Israel is hosting Russian president Vladimir Putin, with a major topic of discussion being the crisis in Syria. Israel is concerned with Syrian instability and the possibility of weapons ending up in the hands of Hezbollah as a result. Israeli president Shimon Peres also expressed disgust with the Syrian regime, saying that “Assad stopped being an alternative when he started firing at his children…None of us can tolerate coffins filled with the bodies of children. That’s beyond politics.” For his part, Putin stated that he is “not obligated to Assad, but Russia and Syria have strategic relations.”

Mohammad Ataie writes in The Guardian that Iran is attempting to find a political solution to the crisis in Syria, despite its continued attachment to Bashar al-Assad. “Iran is not on the same side of the Syrian conflict as the US and its allies,” Ataie said, “but it does have a big stake in ending the bloodshed and finding a political solution to the crisis. This is common ground that should not be ignored in any genuine initiative to stop the unrelenting bloodshed and in beginning the implementation of reform in Syria. Kofi Annan has also expressed a desire to see Iran involved in talks toward ending the bloodshed in Syria, but will ultimately leave it up to the U.S. and Russia.

Today Syrian rebels and Republican Guard forces continue to clash outside Damascus, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reporting that six have been killed in heavy fighting. …more

Experts say “crimes against freedom of expression” should have special status
26 June, 2012 – by Français Partager

Reporters Without Borders welcomes yesterday’s joint declaration by four international experts calling on governments to treat “crimes against freedom of expression” as a special category under criminal law and thereby provide journalists and other news providers with better protection.

The joint call was issued by the United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe representative on freedom of the media, the Organization of American States special rapporteur on freedom of expression and the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights special rapporteur on freedom of expression and access to information.

It came just five days after both Frank La Rue, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, and Christoph Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, issued separate reports calling for greater efforts to protect journalists.

“These four experts have issued their joint call for crimes against freedom of expression to be assigned a special status under criminal law, with specific penalties, because they recognize the role that freedom of information plays in society, whether the information providers are professional journalists, citizen journalists or netizens,” Reporters Without Borders said.

“This joint declaration also testifies to the concern these experts feel for the safety of news providers and their awareness of the urgency of the situation. It stresses that governments have an obligation to investigate these crimes, to protect the victims and ensure that they have access to justice.”

Reporters Without Borders hopes that the joint declaration and the two reports will encourage state and non-state actors to adopt concrete measures to protect journalists and to combat impunity for those responsible for acts of violence against them.

“These experts have paved the way,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Now it is up to governments to implement their recommendations and give them binding force as soon as possible.”

A total of 29 professional journalists and at least 12 citizen journalists have been killed since the start of 2012 because of their commitment to providing news and information. Dozens of journalists have also been forced to flee abroad to escape harassment, violence, threats of arbitrary arrest or death. A total of 80 journalists fled into exile in 2011. …source

The youngest victims of tear gas in Bahrain – the babies and the unborn
24 June, 2012 – Bahrain Coordinating Committee – by Mary Fletcher Jones

Excessive exposure to tear gas has been demonstrated to cause miscarriage in pregnancy, and infants are particularly susceptible to the side effects of tear gas, which can be fatal in instances. Unfortunately, in Bahrain, many families have lost their young and unborn babies through exposure to tear gas.

On Thursday, June 21, a demonstration was held in Bahrain to bring attention to this tragic development. However, the demonstration was not met with sympathy. The protesters were fired on with tear gas and stun grenades. During the clash, even two press photographers, one from Associated Press, were temporarily detained by riot police.

For the past two years, tear gas has been used against Bahrainis in a number of ways — much of it indiscriminate and excessive. It has been used against protesters, fired into neighborhoods, and even propelled directly into homes. The BICI report stated that Bahrain’s police used a disproportionate amount of CS gas when dispersing protests, and that in a number of situations, police fired CS gas into private homes in an “unnecessary and indiscriminate” manner. …more

Iran reminds Bahrain rights violations make situation more complicated
23 June, 2012 – PressTV

Iran has warned the government of Bahrain against escalating violence in the Persian Gulf country, saying that human rights violations will only further complicate the existing situation.

Speaking to reporters during his weekly briefing on Saturday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast expressed Iran’s concern over armed attacks and direct shots targeting leaders of various opposition groups in Bahrain.

He also condemned continuation of violent measures and suppression of Bahraini people’s peaceful demonstrations by the Saudi-backed forces.

Mehmanparast expressed hope the government of Bahrain will change its approach to the people’s peaceful protests and instead of violent suppression of demonstrations, pay serious attention to people’s legitimate demands.

The spokesman advised the Bahraini government to pave the way for serious dialogue by taking confidence-building measures like releasing political prisoners, and preventing military courts from handing down harsh verdicts against academics and medical staff as well as women and the youth who pursue their natural rights.

On Friday, June 22, Saudi-backed Bahraini forces attacked anti-government protesters in the capital, Manama, injuring several demonstrators, including three senior opposition leaders.

Sheikh Ali Salman, the Secretary General of Bahrain’s main opposition bloc al-Wefaq, Hassan al-Marzooq and Jawad Fairouz, both al-Wefaq figures, were injured during the crackdown.

Salman is reported to be shot in the shoulder and back while Marzooq is shot and wounded in the chest. There was no word on how Fairouz was injured.

Bahrainis have been staging demonstrations since mid-February 2011, demanding political reform and a constitutional monarchy, a demand that later changed to an outright call for the ouster of the ruling Al Khalifa family following its brutal crackdown on popular protests.

Scores of people have also been killed and many others have been injured in the Saudi-backed crackdown on peaceful protesters in Bahrain. …more

US Ambassador in Bahrain:Iran is not interfering in the internal affairs of the GCC countries
24 June, 2012 – SHAFAQNA

SHAFAQNA (Shia News Association) — Alwatan newspaper a pro- Royal court in Bahrain had interviewed US ambassador in Bahrain Thomas C. Krajeski and he insisted that the revolution in Bahrain not related to Iran interference He said ” So far, I’m not convinced that Iran is interfering in the internal affairs of the GCC countries” then he alleged that “«propaganda» media and news reports issued by the Iranian media are incredible and unacceptable, I read and watch their news on internet, and they are clearly trying to inflame the situation, but this is different from interfering in the internal affairs of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).”

The the reporter asked him ” But the Iranian media part of the state represented by .. What do you think?” He replied ” U.S. Ambassador (answers strongly): I do not agree to that. I do not see evidence of the intervention of Iran”

The reporter tried again to take one word from his mouth to condemned Iran interference by asking ” Do you think they are media loyal or opposition or neutral in Iran?! Acertainly well known that the Iranian media follows the authority of clerical rule and the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei”

US ambassador said ” Inside the Iran situation is different, but if your question is that Iran is interfering in the affairs of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), I do not see any evidence of that, other than «propaganda» Media and news.”

when the reporter did not get the answer as he want , again he ask “Iranian media is part of the authority and there is no neutral media in Iran as there is no opposition to the regime allow in Iran until there is information shows?

The US ambassador made clearly at the end saying ” I understand your question, but what of the effect or impact?!” …source

Bahrain Cracks Down on Social Media, Arresting Activists and Proposing New Laws
By The Stranger – 18 June, 2012 BY EVA GALPERIN

Bahrain’s Minister of State for Information Affairs, Samira Rajab, has announced that the government is preparing to introduce tough new laws to combat the “misuse” of social media. Like many Gulf states, Bahrain is doubling down on state censorship in response to a year of ongoing protests connected to the Arab Spring. In case the target of this upcoming legislation was in any way unclear, Ms. Rajab went on to call out human rights activists:

It is these activists who have labelled drowning victims as those killed by torture. They have labelled sickle cell victims as being killed by security forces and they have used these media to completely distort the true picture of Bahrain. This cannot be tolerated. The rule of law shall prevail.”

Ms. Rajab justified the upcoming laws by pointing to sedition laws in the United States, United Kingdom, and France.

Meanwhile, the Bahraini government is already engaging in the kind of crackdown that the new law is supposed to enable. Activist Nabeel Rajab (no relation to the Minister of State for Information Affairs) was detained again on June 6 after complaints that he had made statements “publicly vilifying” pro-government individuals on Twitter. After the Prime Minister visited the small town of Muharraq, Mr. Rajab tweeted that he should step down. He referenced the Prime Minister’s recent visit to Muharraq in his message:

[E]veryone knows you are not popular and if it weren’t for the need for money, [the Muharraq residents] would not have welcomed you.

Mr. Rajab’s attorney notes that his second detention is extraordinary even in Bahrain, since The Bahraini Code of Criminal Procedure limits pretrial detention to exceptional cases. Authorities are not supposed to detain the accused in defamation cases, and the most severe penalty has usually been a fine.

Mr. Rajab had been previously released from jail after posting bail at the end of May. That time, the activist had also been arrested for inflammatory political comments from his Twitter account. The EFF joins other groups such as Human Rights Watch and the European-Bahraini Organization for Human Rights in demanding the immediate and unconditional release of Mr. Rajab, as well as the dismissal of all charges against him. We remain concerned we will see even more cases similar to this one once the new laws are passed. …more

NGOs urged to comply with foreign funds rule in Bahrain
22 June, 2012 -By Habib Toumi

Bahrain’s social development minister has urged all local societies, organisations, clubs and foundations to comply with the law regulation obtaining funds from abroad or sending money overseas.

“The law clearly specifies that sending or receiving funds from abroad requires the approval of the ministry, and while societies in general have upheld the rules, others have failed to report the transactions,” Fatima Al Beloushi said.

“We urge all NGOs to cooperate positively with the ministry on the laws regulating across the border funds and to obtain the required clearance from the ministry before they send or receive foreign funds,” she said.

Al Beloushi did not name the NGOs that did not comply with the 1989 rule that bars financial transactions with foreign entities without the ministry’s approval, but said that the authorities have discovered cases of individual members receiving funds from abroad.

“The commitment of the adherents is not less significant than that of their societies, especially in the movement of suspicious funds across the borders,” she said.

Al Beloushi, the second woman minister to be given a portfolio in the government, said that the Bahraini authorities were tracking transfers as part of the policy to combat financing terrorism or facilitating money laundering. …more

Bahrain opposition says leader injured as police stop protesters from holding rally
22 June, 2012 – By Associated Press

MANAMA, Bahrain — Bahraini riot police fired tear gas, stun grenades and rubber bullets Friday, injuring the head of the Shiite majority’s main political bloc while trying to break up protests in the country’s capital, the opposition said.

Al Wefaq’s secretary-general Sheik Ali Salman told The Associated Press he was hit in the shoulder and back by either a tear gas canister or stun grenade during demonstrations in Manama, which are common following Friday prayers. He had red welts on his skin but seemed otherwise in good health. Al Wefaq had earlier said that rubber bullets had caused the injury.

He said he was leading about 40 protesters on the way to a march when they encountered police who ordered them to disperse and then started firing into the crowd.

Hassan al-Marzooq, another opposition leader, was hit in the neck by a rubber bullet, an Al Wefaq statement said. He has since been taken to a private hospital in the capital for treatment.

Salman said the leaders had been intentionally targeted, the first time that the Bahrain security forces had done so.

“More violations will complicate our efforts for reconciliation and a meaningful dialogue,” he said. “We continue our democratic demands and call for universal human rights principles through peaceful assemblies. It is the people’s right.” …more

The US planning a rather large footprint in Kuwait for several years.

US Basing Substantial Force Out of Kuwait
22 June 2012 – The Grog

The United States is planning a significant military presence of 13,500 troops in Kuwait to give it the flexibility to respond to sudden conflicts in the region as Iraq adjusts to the withdrawal of American combat forces and the world nervously eyes Iran, according to a congressional report.
The study by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee examined the U.S. relationship with the six nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council – Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman – against a fast-moving backdrop. In just the last two days, Saudi Arabia’s ruler named Defense Minister Prince Salman bin Abdul-Aziz as the country’s new crown prince after last week’s death of Prince Nayef, and Kuwait’s government suspended parliament for a month over an internal political feud.

The latest developments inject even more uncertainty as the Middle East deals with the demands of the Arab Spring, the end to U.S. combat operations in Iraq at the end of 2011 and fears of Iran’s nuclear program.

“Home to more than half of the world’s oil reserves and over a third of its natural gas, the stability of the Persian Gulf is critical to the global economy,” the report said. “However, the region faces a myriad of political and security challenges, from the Iranian nuclear program to the threat of terrorism to the political crisis in Bahrain.”

The report obtained by The Associated Press in advance of Tuesday’s release provided precise numbers on U.S. forces in Kuwait, a presence that Pentagon officials have only acknowledged on condition of anonymity. Currently, there are about 15,000 U.S. forces in Kuwait at Camp Arifjan, Ali Al Salem Air Base and Camp Buehring, giving the United States staging hubs, training ranges and locations to provide logistical support. The report said the number of troops is likely to drop to 13,500. …source

As Hopes for Reform Fade in Bahrain, Protesters Turn Anger on United States
Ed Ou for The New York Times
25 June, 2012 – NYT

MANAMA, Bahrain — In a dark alleyway of a low-slung suburb here, two dozen protesters gathered quietly and prepared to march toward a United States naval base. A teenager wrapped his scarf close to his mouth, bracing for tear gas. A man peeked out of his doorway, holding his infant daughter above his head, to show her a ritual of defiance that has become a grinding way of life.

For months, the protests have aimed at the ruling monarchy, but recently they have focused on a new target. To their familiar slogans — demanding freedoms, praising God and cursing the ruling family — the young protesters added a new demand, written on a placard in English, so the Americans might see: “U.S.A. Stop arming the killers.”

Thousands of Bahrainis rose up 16 months ago, demanding political liberties, social equality and an end to corruption. But the Sunni monarchy, seen by the United States and Saudi Arabia as a strategic ally and as a bulwark against Iran, was never left to face the rage on its own.

More than a thousand Saudi troops helped put down the uprising and remain in Bahrain, making it a virtual protectorate. The United States, a sometimes critical but ultimately unshakable friend, has called for political reform but strengthened its support for the government. Last month, the Obama administration resumed arms sales here.

Backed by powerful allies, the government has pursued reform on its own terms. Dialogue between the country’s Shiite majority and the king has stopped. Twenty-one of the most prominent dissidents still languish in prison, and no senior officials have been convicted of crimes, including dozens of killings, that occurred during the crackdown last year. Opposition activists are still regularly detained or interrogated for their words.

On Friday, in what activists called a dangerous escalation, riot police officers forcefully dispersed a rally by Bahrain’s largest opposition party, injuring its leader. Every night, protesters march and clashes erupt, in a violent standoff that often seems a breath away from an explosion.

Some Bahrainis had pinned hopes for reconciliation on a report, issued six months ago, that investigated the events of February and March 2011 and found that the security forces had used indiscriminate force and torture in putting down the uprising. King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa promised to heed the report’s findings and punish officials responsible for abuse. …more

Press Release: Calling for #Self-Determination – We Are Not There Yet!
by Pearl Revolution Political Center – مركز 14 فبراير السياسي on Thursday, June 7, 2012 at 6:30pm ·

After more than six months in suspension, the Youth Coalition of Feb 14 Revolution has suddenly decided to resume the “Self-determination” anti-regime protests, which they organized throughout the last year. In political terms, Self-determination is “the principle in international law that nations have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and international political status with no external compulsion or interference(1)”.

It is worth to mention that the concept was first promoted by US ex-president Woodrow Wilson following WW1(2). Knowing how US policy makers think, the purpose behind promoting self-determination was not a noble one at all but was the complete opposite. The concept was used to fuel sectarian and tribal conflicts in rival countries in order to undermine the political systems or at the very least to destabilize them. It is not surprising that the UN only intervene to “help” nations achieve self-determination after destructive and armed conflicts.

Although some exceptions apply, such as the case when the UK occupation of Bahrain was ended in 1971 where a “fake” self-determination vote was conducted. The end result was merely a replacement of UK occupation by complete US influence and hence real self-determination was never achieved.

Another recent example is the independence of South Sudan district from Khartoum (which is outside US sphere of influence). The very first diplomatic visit conducted by the president of the “new” nation was to the occupied Palestinian territories (Israel)!

In other words, relying on the UN and the “International Community” to achieve self-determination is pointless because the end results would be pre-determined to benefit US interests and its Western allies.

The Youth Coalition of Feb 14 Revolution has called for the right of self-determination based on UN guidelines(3). In our opinion, this approach is futile and would place the fate of the Bahrain revolution in the hands of the US because the UN is nothing but a US puppet after all.

Nevertheless, there are two possible options for a self-determination vote in Bahrain:

1) Constitutional Monarchy.

2) Second: an independent state – such as republic.

Even in the unlikely event where the UN (and US) support self-determination vote, the first option is guaranteed to triumph due to the massive and unlawful political naturalization in Bahrain and abroad too.

Nonetheless, the right for self-determination does not exempt criminals from punishment regardless of the vote result. And since all regime figureheads in Bahrain have committed crimes against humanity (including Salman the Alkhalifa Crown Prince), the first option effectively becomes invalid and thus the second option wins by acclamation and there would be no need for self-determination vote from the first place!
…more

Three US ‘diplomats’ detained in Peshawar for illegally carrying weapons
4 June, 2012 – Shia Post

PESHAWAR: Six people, including three US nationals, were detained Monday after police discovered a large cache of illegal arms from their vehicles.

According to police sources, the “suspicious cars” were stopped for a routine check at the Peshawar Motorway toll plaza when the weapons were discovered.

Police sources told Dawn.com that the weapons included 4 M4 assault rifles with 36 magazines and 4 pistols with 30 magazines.

US Consul General Mary Richard also reached the police station where the Americans were detained for questioning, urging officials to seize weapons but not to detain the foreigners.

The US Consul General however refused to give any comments on the arrests when approached by our reporter.

The six detained include three foreigners described as US diplomats, as well as three Pakistanis, which included a security guard and two drivers.

According to recent instruction from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, foreign diplomats are prohibited from carrying weapons or travelling to prohibited areas in the province unless expressly permitted by the provincial government with a No Objection Certificate (NOC). …more

A Normal Day in Sitra
03 June , 2012 – AhlamOun.com

A Normal Day in Sitra (1)

An old man holding his walking stick in one hand,
and a bread he just bought for his family on the other.
lifting one foot slowly after the other in pain,
Police start shooting teargas .. both of his hands occupied,
He can’t throw his walking stick because he needs to walk,
He can’t throw his bread because he needs to feed his family,
He collapse in the middle of the street, suffocating!
A normal day in Sitra !

A Normal Day in Sitra (2)

A mother calling her son;
Mom : “Son, where are you? Did you pick the medicine for your sister from the pharmacy?”
Son : “Yes Mom, I picked up the medicine , I am a block away .. don’t worry I am almost there.”

30 minutes later.

Mom calls again and an auto answer on the phone.
“THE NUMBER YOU ARE CALLING CANNOT BE REACHED AT THE MOMENT”

3 days later,

Mother receives a call from an unknown number,
“YOUR TRAITOR SON IS IN PRISON FOR PROTESTING”
Mom :”Where is my son!! I didn’t hear from him in 3 days!!”
Voice: “He is in the prison hospital.”
Mom: “WHY??? WHAT DID YOU DO TO HIM??”

…… line disconnected!

A Normal Day in Sitra (3)

A woman with her kids in the car visiting her family in Sitra,
An alien with a police uniform and his gun pointing at car nodding at her,

Woman : “Please, don’t scare my kids, I am here to visit my family.”

Policeman: ……..

Woman: “لو سمحت، لا تفزع أطفالي… اريد أن ازور اهلي”

Policeman: …….

Policeman speaks in foreign language, pointing at her to turn back not allowing her to pass!

He doesn’t understand Arabic nor English.

A normal day in Sitra ! (4)

5 teenage kids playing outside their house,
A Turkish-Made Police Tanks storming from one side of an alley,
Police jeeps rush from the other side,
Policemen rush out with their guns!
Next day a headline in a local newspaper;

“5 people were arrested for illegal gathering!”

A normal day in Sitra ! (5)

Grandmother: “It’s almost 12:00 PM, where are you going in his heat?”

Grandfather : “I am taking our grandson to pray in the historic mosque of Shaikh Aabid, I’ll come back after 2 hours”

10 minutes later,

Grandmother: “Oh! that was quick?! and why the sad look in your face??”

Grandfather : “The government demolished the entire mosque!!! it vanished!”

Grandson : “Grand-dad, I promise you, I will rebuild it and you will pray in it again!”

…more

Arab Monarchies: Surviving the Revolts
By: Sultan Sooud Al Qassemi – 3 November, 2011

In the mid 20th century a majority of Arabs lived in monarchical states, some dating as far back as several centuries. However, by the 1960s, the monarchies of Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Iraq and Yemen had transformed into republics. Today, eight Arab monarchies remain, namely, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, the UAE, Qatar and the Sultanate of Oman.

The reason some Arab monarchies ceased to exist varies from popular revolutions to military coups. However one feature they shared is their lack of ability to adapt to the changing geopolitical environment of surrounding countries from South Asia to Africa, gaining their independence and empowering their people as well as their own citizens.

The need to adapt to a changing environment is now more necessary than ever. The 2011 popular Arab uprisings that are spreading throughout the region will affect every single country in the region, if not in the short term then several years down the line. For instance, citizens of nominal republics such as Sudan will not continue to tolerate their dictators while they witness history being made by their Egyptian neighbors preparing to vote in the next few months. The eight Arab monarchies, even those whom, as I have argued earlier, have scored highly on human development reports will similarly have to face new realities that are taking shape both within their borders and in the region.

Due to the varied nature of these monarchies such an evolution into constitutional monarchies will likely occur in three cycles. The first cycle will include Kuwait, Jordan and Morocco, the second Bahrain and Oman, and the third Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.

Setting up constitutional monarchies has been attempted in the past. Half a century ago, as Arabs were rising up against their governments and mere months after it gained its independence from Britain, Kuwait’s Emir, Sheikh Abdullah Al Salem unveiled a constitution that even today, is decades ahead of both Arab monarchies and republics alike. The constitution guaranteed Kuwaitis freedom of religion, speech and the press. Additionally, while enshrining a role for the Emir, it specifically stated that Kuwait’s system of rule is democratic with an elected assembly.

The managing editor of a Gulf based English newspaper told me he believes that the current controversial Prime Minister of Kuwait, Sheikh Nasser Al Sabah (71), will be the last premier to be appointed directly by an emir and the last to be chosen from the royal family. Sheikh Nasser was forced to resign by opposition MPs six times since his appointment in February 2006. Rhetoric that is not often heard used against members of Gulf ruling families is casually employed against Sheikh Nasser, with news wires quoting an MP at a recent 10,000 strong rally demanding his sacking describing him as “incompetent,” and saying that he “cannot be trusted”. These are some of the reasons that indicate Kuwait will likely be the first Arab monarchy to officially transform into a constitutional monarchy. …more

Opposition to enter dialogue
2 June, 2012 – UPI

MANAMA, Bahrain, June 2 (UPI) — Bahrain has offered to resume negotiations with the opposition al-Wefaq party in a bid to solve the ongoing political crisis, an official said.

Information Minister Samira Rajab said Bahrain leaders are trying to find some common ground with al-Wefaq “despite insurmountable obstacles and unfeasible conditions” in a bid to pave the way for dialogue, CNN Arabic reported Saturday.

Akhbar al-Khaleej newspaper said state officials and leading members of al-Wefaq have already met “unofficially” to iron out the details of the dialogue and discuss prerequisites.

Al-Wefaq, which represents Bahrain’s Shiite community, pulled out of the national dialogue in 2011 after violence exploded in the kingdom.

…more

Four Shia Muslims & two others killed in Wahabi’s attack in Quetta.
Pakistan – 3 June, 2012

Four Shia Hazara’s, and Two others including a policeman, were gunned down by the American and Saudi backed Nasabi-Wahabi terrorists in Quetta Sirki Road here on Sunday.

The armed terrorists of Nasabi-Wahabi banned outfits of Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba (Yazeed) on motorcycles opened fire on a Cement shop on Sirki Road, Quetta, the provincial capital of violent Balochistan Province.

Four Shia Hazara’s victims were inside the shop whereas the other two victims were passersby, police sources said. The bodies were shifted to the Civil hospital where the families of the victims were staged protest against the brutal killing. A heavy contingent of police reached the crime scene and cordoned off the area. A search operation is underway. Police sources said that this appeared to be an incident of target killing. …source

…more